MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999033039 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.195103

Kinetic energy functional for a two-dimensional electron system

2007· article· en· W1999033039 on OpenAlexaff
M. Koivisto, M. J. Stott

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFermi gasPhysicsThomas–Fermi modelOrbital-free density functional theoryLimit (mathematics)Density functional theoryKinetic energyElectronFermi energyFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopeQuantum mechanicsEnergy (signal processing)Electron densityStatistical physicsLocal-density approximationMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The noninteracting, nonuniform electron gas exhibits simplifications in two dimensions that are of particular interest in the application of density functional theory. The results of linear response theory for an attractive impurity in a two-dimensional gas have been shown to be surprisingly accurate even though there are bound states and are shown to be exact in the high density limit. We offer the alternative view that these results depend not so much on the properties of linear response but on a special feature of all density response functions in two dimensions. This feature leads to the result that all density gradient corrections to the Thomas-Fermi result for the electron kinetic energy functional vanish in two dimensions at zero temperature. This is not to say that the Thomas-Fermi result is exact, but numerical calculations show that it is a very good approximation for an attractive potential even in a low density gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207