Pericardial Hemangioma Presenting as Thoracic Mass in utero
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pericardial hemangiomas are rare lesions. We present the case of an infant who was referred to our fetal diagnosis and treatment group for the presence of a left thoracic mass, pleural effusion, and mediastinal shift on fetal ultrasound. The characteristics of the lesion suggested the presence of a pulmonary sequestration. A chest radiograph done at birth was normal. At 2 weeks of age, an enhancing lesion of the left pericardium was identified on chest CT. A cardiac MRI demonstrated enhancement of the mass on T2-weighted images. The patient underwent thoracoscopic assessment of the mass for diagnostic purposes. Multiple lesions were identified along the left pericardium and diaphragm. A frozen section biopsy revealed a hemangioma. The natural history for hemangiomas is gradual regression; however, they may increase acutely in size and cause symptoms prior to involution. Investigations should be performed to identify the involvement of other organs. This case illustrates the need to closely follow all patients with prenatally diagnosed thoracic masses with CT imaging, even when they are asymptomatic and have a normal chest radiograph at birth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".