MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999088651 · doi:10.3917/th.711.0022

Les comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle : une étude empirique sur les relations avec l'engagement affectif, la satisfaction au travail et l'implication au travail

2008· article· fr· W1999088651 on OpenAlex
Pascal Paillé

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLe travail humain · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ Ces dix dernières années, le thème des comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle a généré une abondante littérature. Malgré cela, le rôle des attitudes au travail reste mal compris. Une étude empirique a été réalisée sur un échantillon de 122 responsables d’agence bancaire pour examiner les relations empiriques entre les comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle, la satisfaction au travail, l’engagement affectif envers l’organisation et l’implication au travail. Les données empiriques montrent que l’engagement affectif envers l’organisation ne prédit aucun comportement de citoyenneté organisationnelle. La satisfaction au travail et l’implication au travail prédisent respectivement l’altruisme et les vertus civiques. La contribution, les apports et les limites de cette recherche sont discutés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it