Les comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle : une étude empirique sur les relations avec l'engagement affectif, la satisfaction au travail et l'implication au travail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Ces dix dernières années, le thème des comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle a généré une abondante littérature. Malgré cela, le rôle des attitudes au travail reste mal compris. Une étude empirique a été réalisée sur un échantillon de 122 responsables d’agence bancaire pour examiner les relations empiriques entre les comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle, la satisfaction au travail, l’engagement affectif envers l’organisation et l’implication au travail. Les données empiriques montrent que l’engagement affectif envers l’organisation ne prédit aucun comportement de citoyenneté organisationnelle. La satisfaction au travail et l’implication au travail prédisent respectivement l’altruisme et les vertus civiques. La contribution, les apports et les limites de cette recherche sont discutés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".