Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A familiar and useful representation of modality invokes a space of possible worlds, and quantification over it: necessity and possibility are represented, respectively, with universal and existential quantification—so that necessity is truth at all possible worlds; possibility, truth at some. While modality comes in many varieties, a familiar thought gives a singular position to metaphysical modality, as the broadest objective variety, pertaining to ‘what could not have been otherwise no matter what’. Relativized metaphysical modality may be heuristically understood as a substantive metaphysical repurposing of more familiar ‘epistemic two-dimensional’ semantical machinery, which similarly distinguishes between ‘consideration’ of a possible world ‘as actual’ and ‘as counterfactual’. A distinctive metaphysical puzzle challenges the classical treatment of each fragment: for the propositional fragment, the puzzle concerns laws of nature; for the referential fragment, individual essence; for the quantificational fragment, ontology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it