Foaming of Polystyrene/ Thermoplastic Starch Blends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the fabrication of extruded foams from polystyrene/thermoplastic starch (PS/TPS) blends. A specially designed twinscrew extrusion process is used for starch gelatinization, PS incorporation, polymer mixing, and blowing agent incorporation. In-line rheometry is used to monitor the viscosity of the TPS/PS blends and to evaluate the plasticizing effect of 1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) used as blowing agent. Differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, density measurement, and picnometry are used to evaluate the thermal properties, the blend morphology, and the foam cell structure. Glycerol content in the TPS phase and the TPS content in the overall blend have a strong effect on the blend viscosity and, in turn, on the ability to foam the material. The foams blown with the hydrofluorocarbone alone have large open-cell content and their density cannot be reduced below 170 kg/m 3 . The addition of a small amount of ethanol however results in three-fold reductions in density and much better foam cell homogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".