La théorie de la libération dans le contexte socio-économique de l’Amérique latine : économie et théologie ou l’irrationalité du « rationalisé »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article retrace, à travers l’expérience personnelle qu’en a connue l’auteur, la genèse, la trajectoire et le rôle fondamental qu’a joué la question de l’économie au sein de la théologie de la libération. C’est à partir de l’articulation originale de cette théologie à l’économie qu’il rend compte de l’hostilité quelle a suscitée de la part de l’orthodoxie ecclésiale et théologique et de la part de l’« orthodoxie » du capitalisme néo-libéral. Il décortique longuement la « théologie » capitaliste qui tente maintenant de se substituer à la théologie de la libération après l’avoir vainement dénoncée. L’article se termine sur une critique théologique acérée de l’absolutisation de la « loi », de l’anti-utopisme et de la sacrificialité inhérents au néo-libéralisme actuel, qualifié de totalitaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".