Nramp1 Modifies the Fusion of Salmonella typhimurium-containing Vacuoles with Cellular Endomembranes in Macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Salmonella survive and replicate within mammalian cells by becoming secluded within specialized membrane-bound vacuoles inaccessible to the host defense mechanisms. Delayed acidification of the vacuole and its incomplete fusion with lysosomes have been implicated in intracellular Salmonella survival. Nramp1 confers to macrophages resistance to a variety of intracellular pathogens, including Salmonella, but its precise mode of action is not understood. We investigated whether Nramp1 affects the maturation and acidification of Salmonella-containing vacuoles (SCV). A mouse-derived macrophage line (RAW/Nramp1(-)) devoid of Nramp1 and therefore susceptible to infection was compared with isogenic clones stably transfected with Nramp1 (RAW/Nramp1(+)). Intravacuolar pH, measured in situ, was similar in Nramp1-expressing and -deficient cells. SCV acquired LAMP1 and fused with preloaded fluid-phase markers in both cell types. In contrast, although few vacuoles in RAW/Nramp1(-) acquired mannose 6-phosphate receptor, many more contained M6PR in RAW/Nramp1(+) cells. Shortly after closure, SCV in RAW/Nramp1(-) became inaccessible to extracellular markers, suggesting inability to fuse with newly formed endosomes. Expression of Nramp1 markedly increased the access to extracellularly added markers. We propose that Nramp1 counteracts the ability of Salmonella to become secluded in a compartment that limits access of bactericidal agents, allowing the normal degradative pathway of the macrophage to proceed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".