MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999168546 · doi:10.1109/sws.2010.5607474

A general social intelligent algorithmic framework for packing problem with multi-processors

2010· article· en· W1999168546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacking problemsComputer scienceRectangleSet packingConstruct (python library)Bin packing problemAlgorithmCircle packingAlgorithm designTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we establish a general social intelligent algorithmic framework for packing problem under the help of the conception of social computing. In this framework, packing problem can be solved intelligently, with the same asymptotic bounds by applying the existing packing algorithms. More precisely, our framework is designed to intelligently adopt the most proper one among all the given existing packing algorithms to pack the fixed given rectangle according to the present packing scenario. Moreover, for single packing processor, the algorithm created by our framework certainly turns out to be the algorithm the processor holds. But for multiple packing processors, it can construct and provide one social parallel intelligent packing algorithm based on all existing ones. This constructed algorithm certainly better than any algorithm involved, since the most proper algorithm is always adopted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Packing ProblemsFrench-language works237,207