Modulation of claw-closing behavior in the crayfish<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>by extrinsic factors and biogenic amines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Claw closure in the crayfish can be elicited by tactile stimulation of the closer-field sensory hairs located along the biting surfaces of the apposed dactyl and propodite. The possibility that this simple behavior can be extrinsically modulated was examined by stimulating closer-field hairs in specimens of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii while the animals were either unrestrained, restrained, or bathed in chemical feeding stimulants. Restraint increases both the probability of closure and the average angular velocity of the dactyl during closure compared with responses in unrestrained specimens. Chemical feeding stimulants increase the probability, but not the average angular velocity, of closure compared with the unrestrained condition. Injection of octopamine into unrestrained animals produces effects on claw closure that resemble those accompanying restraint. Injection of serotonin, however, is followed by decreases in both the probability and the average angular velocity of closure. It is argued that extrinsic factors modulate claw-closure behavior in ways appropriate to current circumstances, and that biogenic amines are implicated as "gain-setters" in this process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".