MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999241030 · doi:10.3801/iafss.fss.8-291

Fire Resistance Of Exterior Walls: Model And Full-scale Test

2005· article· en· W1999241030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFire Safety Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGypsumStrappingCavity wallThermal insulationMaterials scienceStructural engineeringComposite materialFull scaleHeat transferFire resistanceFire testEngineeringMechanicsLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper describes a heat transfer model for prediction of the thermal response of woodframed exterior walls constructed with 105 mm by 105 mm wood post, gypsum board attached to the wood post on the interior side of the wall, insulation foam between posts, an air cavity of ventilation purposes, and a 12 mm thick non-combustible (ceramic) exterior siding attached to the wall over the wood strapping. This is a typical Japanese 'post and beam' type exterior walls. This paper examines the fire resistance of this type of wall when the exterior face of the wall is exposed to fire. The model calculates heat transfer through the siding, the air cavity, wood strapping, foamed-plastic insulation, wood posts and the gypsum board on the interior face. Mass transfer was not considered in this model. When the calculated results were compared to the results from full-scale fire-endurance tests, very good agreement was observed. The paper also describes the effect of the thickness and density of the exterior siding and gypsum board on the fire resistance of the exterior walls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it