Electrochemical Polymerization and Characterization of Poly(3-(4-fluorophenyl)thiophene) in Pure Ionic Liquids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical oxidation of 3-(4-fluorophenyl) thiophene (FPT) at a platinum electrode in pure 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium bis ((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl) amide, EDMITFSI, and 1,3-diethyl-5-methylimidazolium bis ((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl) amide, DEMITFSI, yielded an electroactive polymer. This polymer (PFPT) was similar to that prepared from common nonaqueous media such as tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate/acetonitrile, but it was characterized by slower ion insertion kinetics. A rapid loss of electroactivity of the polymer was observed upon cycling in pure ionic liquid, and that was attributed to gradual deswelling of the polymer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements demonstrated that the doping processes of PFPT when cycled in pure ionic liquid were similar to those occurring in acetonitrile-based electrolyte and involved the incorporation of the anions (TFSI - ) of the ionic liquid when the polymer was oxidized to the p-doped state. The expulsion of these anions and the incorporation of the ionic liquid cationic species were observed upon reduction of the polymer to the fully n-doped state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".