STAT3: A Central Mediator of Pulmonary Fibrosis?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis is a devastating, relentlessly progressive, and lethal disease. There is a significant unmet need for effective treatment since currently no FDA-approved therapies exist. Current thinking suggests that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is initiated by pathways similar to normal wound healing, but relentless fibrosis occurs secondary to absent or defective inhibitory mechanisms that normally terminate wound healing. The heterogeneous pathological presentation of fibrosis suggests that the anatomic location and origin of fibroblasts and other cells might be critical for their phenotype and function and will impact on strategies to prevent or treat fibrotic lung diseases. This review summarizes our current understanding of the pathobiology of IPF, with a specific focus on the role of STAT3 in regulating cellular responses that may contribute to or inhibit pro-fibrotic processes. An improved understanding of the complex cell-type specific roles that this transcription factor plays in normal lung and in fibrosis is required to determine its suitability as an effective therapeutic target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".