Maximum likelihood network topology identification from edge-based unicast measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network tomography is a process for inferring "internal" link-level delay and loss performance information based on end-to-end (edge) network measurements. These methods require knowledge of the network topology; therefore a first crucial step in the tomography process is topology identification. This paper considers the problem of discovering network topology solely from host-based, unicast measurements, without internal network cooperation. First, we introduce a novel delay-based measurement scheme that does not require clock synchronization, making it more practical than other previous proposals. In contrast to methods that rely on network cooperation , our methodology has the potential to identify layer two elements (provided they are logical topology branching points and induce some measurable delay). Second, we propose a maximum penalized likelihood criterion for topology identification. This is a global optimality criterion, in contrast to other recent proposals for topology identification that employ suboptimal, pair-merging strategies. We develop a novel Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure for rapid determination of the most likely topologies. The performance of our new probing scheme and identification algorithm is explored through simulation and Internet experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it