MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999289115 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2012.0011

Teaching Cranford in Taiwan

2012· article· en· W1999289115 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shu‐chuan Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyContext (archaeology)ConsciousnessIdeal (ethics)Period (music)SociologyHistoryPhenomenonVictorian eraVictorian literatureGender studiesLiteratureField (mathematics)Media studiesAestheticsPsychologyArt historyArtPoliticsLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teaching Cranford in Taiwan Shu-Chuan Yan (bio) In my work at the National University of Kaohsiung, it has always been an exciting challenge for me to teach Victorian fiction, an upper-level course that concentrates on the analysis and study of literary texts in socio-cultural contexts. Despite the complexity of teaching Victorian novelists in a non-native context, I find that the topic of women is of great interest to my students. Students who take my course are mostly female: the issue of women appeals to them because of their emerging female consciousness. In this context, Elizabeth Gaskell exemplifies a woman writer discussing an important aspect of the role [End Page 15] and nature of women, in particular the representations of unmarried women in the Victorian period. I choose Cranford as an ideal target text although it is not at the core of classic or canonical texts in the field of Victorian studies in Taiwan. To me, it represents authentic material conveying the prevalent ideologies concerning women at the time. It also invites comparison between Victorian England and today’s Taiwan, where men’s and women’s roles have become less strictly defined and where, for both sexes, being single has become a growing social phenomenon. My point of departure is to provide an outlook on Gaskell’s life and her major works, showing the photographs of my trip to Gaskell’s grave as well as my picture with two Gaskell scholars, Alan Shelston and Jenny Uglow, in a tea room at the University of Manchester. These photos arouse the interests of students with little or no prior knowledge of Gaskell: they are excited by the sight of a younger me situated in an exotic setting (one that may help them to envision the literary scene of tea drinking in Cranford). Following this, we start a discussion of Victorian gender stereotypes that provides a window into the culture that produced them. Looking at the strict gender division in Victorian Britain, we discuss if they share some traits with modern ones in Taiwan. I then continue with a brief overview of how the extreme inequities between men and women stimulated a Victorian debate about women’s roles known as “the Woman Question.” Cranford, Gaskell’s second novel, originally developed out of a sequence of stories in Charles Dickens’s weekly magazine Household Words between December 1851 and May 1853. At the outset, I call attention to what the narrator, Mary Smith, tells us: Cranford “is in possession of the Amazons; all the holders of houses above a certain rent, are women” (1). The ironic reference to the Amazons alludes to the world of Cranford as a female community, dominated by widows and spinsters; it also underscores women’s militant hostility towards men. “If a married couple come to settle in the town,” as the narrator describes it, “somehow the gentleman disappears”—“he is either fairly frightened to death by being the only man in the Cranford evening parties, or he is accounted for by being with his regiment, his ship, or closely engaged in business all the week in the great neighboring commercial town of Drumble, distant only twenty miles on a railroad” (1). This often-quoted passage provides a good starting point to introduce Taiwanese students into the female community of Cranford and subsequently brings up a fundamental issue: the predominance of unmarried women and the lack of male characters. I find it important to develop students’ understanding of marriage, the standard destiny for an ideal Victorian woman. When talking about this issue in a Taiwanese context, many of my students respond by saying that they will not marry at a young age, or they can live with their partners without marrying, an increasingly common practice.1 One such response reflects in part their less favorable attitudes toward the institution of marriage and in part their changing views on traditional family values: they will stay single if [End Page 16] their busy lives affect their chances of meeting “Mr. Right.” Furthermore, other students make clear that they do not want to have children for financial reasons, especially when they would have to keep a job in order to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207