Surface rupture of the Poulter Fault in the 1929 March 9 Arthur's Pass earthquake, and redefinition of the Kakapo Fault, New Zealand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The 1929 March 9 Arthur's Pass earthquake of M S 7.1 occurred on a newly mapped fault in the Arthur's Pass region, which we name the Poulter Fault. Surface rupture of at least 16 km and possibly as much as 36 km occurred with 4 m of dextral displacement at one site. The extent of fault rupture coincides very closely with a narrow, elongate zone of intense landsliding. A best estimate of the dip‐slip component of faulting is 1–2 m (north side up), making the 1929 rupture a dextral to oblique‐dextral fault displacement, in keeping with earthquake first motion studies. The Poulter Fault is mapped from the South Hurunui River in a WSW direction to Williams Saddle near the confluence of the Mingha and Edwards Rivers, a distance of nearly 50 km. The 1929 earthquake was not on the Kakapo Fault as previously proposed by Yang. No active fault has been found along the line proposed by Yang, and the Kakapo Fault is here redefined as the southern element of a rhomboid fault wedge formed with the Hope Fault between Kakapo Brook and MacKenzie Stream in the upper Hurunui valley.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it