MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Governança em plataformas logísticas: uma análise dos elementos e atributos a serem considerados neste tipo de empreendimento logístico

2013· article· pt· W1999307486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafael Mozart da Silva, Eliana Terezinha Pereira Senna, Luiz Afonso dos Santos Senna, Orlando Fontes Lima

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport Literature · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As plataformas logísticas são empreendimentos logísticos de grande porte que atendem a uma área ou região, onde se concentram e realizam-se atividades voltadas a produção, transportes, logística e distribuição de mercadorias, utilizando-se de uma mesma base de serviços onde os diferentes atores envolvidos se relacionam com objetivo de obter uma maior eficiência em suas operações. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo identificar os atributos e elementos que podem ser aplicados à governança das plataformas logísticas. Para atingir o objetivo deste trabalho, foi realizado uma revisão bibliográfica sobre os principais conceitos relacionados a governança e plataformas logísticas e também uma pesquisa das características das plataformas logísticas Europeias, extraídas dos relatórios Feasibility of Freight Villages in the NYMTC Region e An Exploration of the Freight Village Concept and its Applicability to Ontario. Como resultado verificou-se que a governança esta associada influência do poder, o grau de hierarquia entre os diferentes atores envolvidos ou participantes e também aos níveis e sinergias que se estabelecem nas relações interorganizacionais tanto na esfera pública como privada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport LiteratureSame topicOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207