MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999324133 · doi:10.1117/12.428228

<title>Analysis of MP3-compressed Doppler ultrasound quadrature signals</title>

2001· article· en· W1999324133 on OpenAlexaff
Tamie L. Poepping, Jeremy D. Gill, Aaron Fenster, David W. Holdsworth

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature (astronomy)Doppler effectComputer sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of lossy, MP3 (MPEG-Layer 3) compression on clinically important Doppler parameters - derived from spectral analysis of Doppler ultrasound signals - was investigated. Ten, 10-second acquisitions of gated Doppler ultrasound signal were collected in a phantom perfused with a pulsatile flow waveform. Doppler data were collected using two sample volume lengths - 1.5 mm and 10 mm. The in- phase and quadrature Doppler signals were digitized at 44.1 kHz and compressed using four grades of signal compression (with corresponding compression ratios given in brackets): uncompressed, 128 kbits/s (11:1), 64 kbits/s (44:1). The digital audio signals were identically processed with a Fourier analysis program that provided an estimate of the instantaneous Doppler frequency (velocity) spectrum and derived parameters such as peak velocity, mean velocity, spectral width, total integrated power, and ratio of spectral power from negative and positive velocities. Analysis of variance indicated there were no significant differences (p>0.05) observed in the peak or mean velocities, spectral width, or the power ratio derived from 128 kbits/s and 64 kbits/s audio signals when compared to the uncompressed audio signals (both sample volume lengths) and the 128 kbits/s audio signals (10 mm sample volume length). However, for the 32 kbits/s audio signals, significant differences (p<0.001) were found in all of the studied parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207