MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999332011 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.177003

Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering Study of Charge Excitations in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>

2002· article· lv· W1999332011 on OpenAlexaff
Young‐June Kim, J. P. Hill, C. A. Burns, S. Wakimoto, R. J. Birgeneau, D. Casa, T. Gög, C. T. Venkataraman

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsExcitationResonant inelastic X-ray scatteringScatteringDispersion (optics)ExcitonDispersion relationCharge (physics)Energy (signal processing)Inelastic scatteringInelastic neutron scatteringCondensed matter physicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study of the dispersion relations of charge-transfer excitations in insulating $\mathrm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{\mathrm{2}}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{u}{\mathrm{O}}_{\mathrm{4}}$. These data reveal two peaks, both of which show two-dimensional characteristics. The lowest energy excitation has a gap energy of $\ensuremath{\sim}2.2\text{ }\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$ at the zone enter, and a dispersion of $\ensuremath{\sim}1\text{ }\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$. The spectral weight of this mode becomes dramatically smaller around ($\ensuremath{\pi}$, $\ensuremath{\pi}$). The second peak shows a smaller dispersion ($\ensuremath{\sim}0.5\text{ }\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$) with a zone-center energy of $\ensuremath{\sim}3.9\text{ }\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$. We argue that these are both highly dispersive exciton modes damped by the presence of the electron-hole continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3350.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207