MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999342533 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0507

Nucleation rates of methane hydrate from water in oil emulsions

2015· article· en· W1999342533 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrey S. Stoporev, A. Yu. Manakov, Л. К. Алтунина, Larisa A. Strelets, Viktor I. Kosyakov

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNucleationMethaneHydrateEmulsionDecaneIsothermal processClathrate hydrateDiffusionChemical engineeringThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nucleation of methane hydrate from water emulsions in five different kinds of crude oil and in decane have been studied with the use of isothermal methods. The experiments were conducted at a temperature of –5 °C and pressure of 12 MPa. It is shown that the nucleation rates tend to decrease with the increase in the density of the organic liquid used to make the emulsion. It is most likely that the observed regularities are related to the rate of methane diffusion to water surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207