Patterns of Internal Elastic Lamina Morphology in the Canine Common Carotid Artery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internal elastic lamina (IEL) of normal canine carotid arteries was examined by scanning electron microscopy in pressure-fixed specimens with intact endothelium. IEL appearance showed a marked variation between animals and was classified into fenestrated sheet, fibrous, and mixed varieties. This interpretation of the apparent morphology was confirmed with transmission electron microscopy. It was clear that IEL fenestrae were associated with surface depressions and that in areas of fibrous IEL there was surface elevation over individual fibres. Within individual animals there was little variation in the pattern of IEL either along or between common carotid arteries. If theories of atherogenesis involving the IEL are correct, the variation of IEL patterns between animals would suggest a corresponding variation of incidence and severity of atheromatous lesions of the common carotid artery between animals. Further, the occurrence of fibrous areas distributed throughout the fenestrated sheet would suggest a focal distribution of lesions along such arteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it