MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999360018 · doi:10.1139/e04-007

Biostratigraphical and ecostratigraphical significance of Tremadoc (Ordovician) graptolite faunas from the Misty Creek Embayment and Selwyn Basin in Yukon and Northwest Territories

2004· article· en· W1999360018 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
D. E. Jackson, B S Norford

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNewcastle University
KeywordsBiozoneGeologyOrdovicianPaleontologyFaunaBiotopeStructural basinAcritarchEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graptolite zones of early and late Tremadoc ages are described from the Elmer Creek Formation in the Selwyn Basin and from the Duo Lake Formation in the Misty Creek Embayment. In ascending order, these are: Staurograptus dichotomus, Anisograptus matanensis, Adelograptus cf. A. tenellus and Aorograptus victoriae Biozones. The uppermost zone embraces the Adelograptus antiquus Biozone, Kiaerograptus? pritchardi Biozone, and the Paradelograptus kinnegraptoides Biozone in the Richardson Trough. Twenty five species are recorded and fourteen species are described, including the first record of the Rhabdinopora fauna in the early Tremadoc of northwest Canada and Kiaerograptus magnus Williams and Stevens and Paratemnograptus isolatus Williams and Stevens in the late Tremadoc. When modifications to Cooper's (1999) ecostratigraphic model are made based on data from Yukon and Northwest Territories, the upper slope biotope and lower slope – ocean-floor biotope become so similar that there is little basis for recognising both biotopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207