MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999360284 · doi:10.1007/s13202-014-0146-6

Recent advances on mitigating wax problem using polymeric wax crystal modifier

2014· article· en· W1999360284 on OpenAlexaff
Bing Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaxEthylene-vinyl acetateMaterials sciencePolymer sciencePolyethyleneEthylenePolymerChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite materialEngineeringCopolymerCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The petroleum industry has addressed wax problems since its inception. Every year, considerable resources are expended on wax removal, which accordingly cause significant economic loss. As one of the materials in chemical treatments, polymeric compounds referred to as “wax-crystal modifier”, is being widely used to improve flow properties and/or combat wax deposition for waxy crude oils. This article reviews the recent achievements with regard to the flow improvement and wax inhibition of waxy oils using traditional polymeric wax crystal modifiers, such as ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA), poly(ethylene–butene) (PEB), and polyethylene-poly(ethylene–propylene) (PE-PEP), as well as the development of novel polymers for potential use in the near future. The goal of this review is to assist people understand the advances in this topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Production TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207