MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999360284 · doi:10.1007/s13202-014-0146-6

Recent advances on mitigating wax problem using polymeric wax crystal modifier

2014· article· en· W1999360284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaxEthylene-vinyl acetateMaterials sciencePolymer sciencePolyethyleneEthylenePolymerChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite materialEngineeringCopolymerCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The petroleum industry has addressed wax problems since its inception. Every year, considerable resources are expended on wax removal, which accordingly cause significant economic loss. As one of the materials in chemical treatments, polymeric compounds referred to as “wax-crystal modifier”, is being widely used to improve flow properties and/or combat wax deposition for waxy crude oils. This article reviews the recent achievements with regard to the flow improvement and wax inhibition of waxy oils using traditional polymeric wax crystal modifiers, such as ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA), poly(ethylene–butene) (PEB), and polyethylene-poly(ethylene–propylene) (PE-PEP), as well as the development of novel polymers for potential use in the near future. The goal of this review is to assist people understand the advances in this topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it