A volumetric and NMR study of cyclodextrin-inhalation anesthetic complexes in aqueous solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The apparent molar volumes (Vϕ) of two anesthetics (halothane and forane) have been determined in water and in binary solvent (H2O + cyclodextrin) systems at 25 °C. The results show that the magnitudes of Vϕ are greater in ternary solutions than in the binary aqueous systems. The apparent molar volumes at infinite dilution (Vϕo) of halothane in ternary solutions are observed to depend on the following factors: (i) the magnitude of the binding constant (K1:1), (ii) the lipophilicity of the anesthetic, (iii) the mole ratio of the host/halothane system, and (iv) the topology (i.e., facial vs. inclusion) of the host/guest complex. The volumetric properties of the ternary systems have been analyzed in terms of the complexed and uncomplexed species by application of Young’s rule. The formation of 1:1 CD–halothane complexes was successfully modeled using a two-state model. The binding affinity of the various cyclodextrins toward halothane is listed in descending order as follows: DM-β-CD > HP-β-CD > β-CD > α-CD > TM-β-CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".