MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999377543 · doi:10.2118/2000-082

Miscibility Evaluation for Terra Nova Offshore Field

2000· article· en· W1999377543 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. N. Rao, J.I. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceOil fieldMiscibilityPetroleumOperations researchSubmarine pipelineEngineeringArchaeologyGeographyComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringGeologyOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In early 2001, Terra Nova is expected to start production at an average rate of 115,000 barrels of oil per day. Terra Nova oil pool is the second largest oil pool discovered in the Grand Banks of the Canadian East Coast. As a part of the oil recovery process optimization effort, miscibility conditions were evaluated using different techniques, for Terra Nova oil with various gas streams available from the offshore production facilities. The techniques used consisted of the conventional slim-tube test, the rising bubble apparatus and the recently developed Vanishing Interfacial Tension (VIT) technique. In addition, published correlations were also used in estimating minimum miscibility pressures. This paper presents the results of these experimental studies and compares them with predictions from correlations as well as with visual evidence of miscibility. The VIT technique is based on the fundamental definition of miscibility as the point at which the interface between gas and oil vanishes or the interfacial tension diminishes to zero. A computerized drop shape analysis technique was used to determine gas-oil interfacial tensions. The miscibility pressures obtained from the new VIT technique were 3–5% higher than those from visual observations and agreed well with the slim-tube results as well as with the correlations, at enrichment levels greater than 30 mole% C2+ in the injected gas stream. The rising bubble apparatus yielded significantly higher MMPs. This study demonstrates that the VIT technique is rapid, reproducible and quantitative in addition to providing visual evidence of gas-oil miscibility. Introduction The recent world-wide survey of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects conducted by the Oil and Gas Journal1 indicates that even with the uncertainty caused by the oil price collapse prior to mid-1999, operators still see EOR processes as opportunities for increasing recovery factors from known oil accumulations. This survey lists 18 field-wide or pilot gas injection projects planned to start between 2000 and 2001 which includes 7 CO2 miscible projects, 7 hydrocarbon miscible projects, 2 hydrocarbon immiscible WAG projects, and 2 nitrogen projects in the world. The size of these projects range from 10 acres for the Sprayberry Trend in Midland County in Texas to 52,000 acres for the PanCanadian's CO2 flood in the Weyburn Unit in Saskatchewan. The survey concludes that EOR processes have weathered the low oil price environment of the last two years and continue to contribute significant oil production. Terra Nova, discovered in 1984, is the second largest oil pool in the Grand Banks of the Canadian east coast. It is located 350 kilometers south-southeast of St. Johns, Newfoundland in 95 meters of water depth. It is anticipated to start production in early 2001 at about 115,000 barrels per day. The production strategies considered for Terra Nova included waterflood, solution gas injection for gas storage and enriched gas injection for miscible flood. In order to evaluate the potential for carrying out a miscible flood in Terra Nova, miscibility conditions were determined for Terra Nova live oil and several field gas streams of differing compositions using the slim-tube displacement test, rising bubble apparatus and the recently developed Vanishing Interfacial Tension (VIT) technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207