MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999378576 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2013-0437

A novel nitrogen-containing compound with D-π-A structure: theoretical and experimental study

2014· article· en· W1999378576 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoting Gong, Ziyan Zhou, Shuguang Zhang, Shuping Zhuo, X. Huang, Si-Quan Jiang, Zhong‐Min Su

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryIsomerizationMethanolDimethylformamideMonomerFluorescenceDensity functional theoryTriazineProton NMRNMR spectra databaseComputational chemistryPhotochemistryPhysical chemistrySpectral lineStereochemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerSolvent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2-(2-Hydroxy-styryl)-4,6-dimethyl-1,3,5-triazine (P1), a novel compound with D-π-A structure, possesses a variety of isomers. Density functional theory calculations were employed to explore the isomerization mechanisms of its various isomers at the 6-311+G** level. The calculated results show that the phenol configurations of compound P1 are more stable than the quinoid configurations, whether they exist as monomers, complexes, with methanol or dimers. The most stable structure of compound P1 was used to calculate the UV-vis and fluorescence spectra. To validate the calculated results, the title compound was synthesized and characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR techniques. The measured absorption and fluorescence spectra of P1 in methanol and N,N-dimethylformamide are in good agreement with the calculated ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207