MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999392725 · doi:10.1177/1081286506066344

Harmonic Shapes in Finite Elasticity

2006· article· en· W1999392725 on OpenAlex
Gang-Feng Wang, Peter Schiavone, C. Q. Ru

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperelastic materialMathematical analysisMathematicsElasticity (physics)HarmonicLinear elasticityCauchy stress tensorStress fieldNonlinear systemPhysicsFinite element methodAcousticsStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the design of harmonic shapes in a particular class of compressible hyperelastic materials of harmonic-type undergoing finite plane deformations. Harmonic shapes are characterized by a `harmonicity condition' imposed on the final stress field. The `harmonicity condition' used in this paper is a generalization of the original condition used in the corresponding problems of linear elasticity: specifically, that the first invariant of the stress tensor (i.e. the sum of the normal stresses) in the original stress field remains unchanged everywhere after the introduction of the harmonic hole or inclusion. Using complex variable techniques, we formulate the general equations for the identification of harmonic shapes in a material of harmonic-type subjected to plane deformations. Under the assumption of uniform biaxial loading, we identify shapes of harmonic rigid inclusions and harmonic free holes. Finally, comparisons are drawn to the analogous cases from linear elasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it