MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999396910 · doi:10.5380/ce.v16i4.25446

CAPACITAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO A DISTÂNCIA: REFLEXÕES DE UM CURSISTA

2011· article· pt· W1999396910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCogitare Enfermagem · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trata-se de uma reflexão acerca da importância do processo de ensino aprendizagem on-line para a formação de tutores em Educação a distância, segundo a percepção do cursista. O estudo destaca o relato da experiência de um aluno inserido nesta modalidade de ensino; sua visão sobre o perfil dos usuários e sua relação como o contexto virtual, bem como a respeito do papel do tutor em todo o processo. O curso ocorreu em plataforma on-line, no período de junho de 2006 a março de 2008, com o conteúdo distribuído em seis Unidades Didáticas. Concluiu-se que capacitações a distância são essenciais para a formação de tutores por proporcionar-lhes conhecimento, habilidades e competências para lidar com as questões inerentes à função que pretendem desenvolver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it