Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Struggles for the control of rural municipal governments have become an important new element of indigenous and peasant political activism throughout the Andean region. An analysis based on field research in rural Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru conducted between 1999 and 2006 reveals that the control of rural municipal power is an important mechanism for enhancing indigenous and peasant political autonomy, improving rural infrastructure and social services, and fostering a sense of citizenship among historically excluded populations. It is also an important element in the production of administratively competent and politically experienced indigenous and peasant leaders. Indigenous and peasant struggles for municipal political power are not simply products of recent decentralization reforms but have deep historical roots in broader struggles for political autonomy and territorial control. While indigenous and peasant control of municipal power represents an important scaling-up of rural struggles in many locales, it carries with it serious dangers of bureaucratization, co-optation, and the fragmentation of indigenous and peasant struggles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it