MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999417024 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v2n1p52

Application of Meshless Natural Neighbour Petrov-Galerkin Method in Temperature Field

2010· article· en· W1999417024 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dongmei Li, Maohui Xia, Yu Chen, Zitao Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrov–Galerkin methodMathematicsRegularized meshless methodGalerkin methodInterpolation (computer graphics)Meshfree methodsMoving least squaresBoundary value problemDelaunay triangulationMathematical analysisStiffness matrixField (mathematics)Applied mathematicsFinite element methodSingular boundary methodGeometryClassical mechanicsBoundary element methodPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Meshless natura1 neighbour Petrov-Galerkin method, The natural neighbour interpolation is used as trial function anda weak form over the local polygonal sub-domains constructed by Delaunay triangular is used to obtain the discretizedsystem of equilibrium equations, and it’s a new truly meshless method. This method simplified the formation of theequilibrium equations, facilitates the imposition of essential boundary conditions and the system stiffness matrix in thepresent method is banded and sparse. Efforts are made to study Meshless natural neighbour Pettrov-Galerkin Method,which is extended to solve the transient heat conduction. The numerical results show that the present method is quiteaccurate and stable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207