Flower preference behaviour of western flower thrips in the Similkameen Valley, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Western flower thrips (WFT), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), occur on most wildflowers, weed and ground cover flowers in the southern interior of B.C., Canada. Preference by WFT for naturally occurring ground cover blooms was determined in a series of choice trials aimed to examine the potential of using such flowers as trap crops under nectarine trees. The effect of height of flowers above ground level within an orchard was also examined to determine whether this may affect flower attractiveness. Although WFT showed consistent preferences for various flower types, no ground cover grown presently in this region appeared to have potential as an effective trap crop. The density of WFT landing on less preferred flower types was not reduced when more attractive flowers also were present, and WFT were found to distribute evenly over all flowers available. Western flower thrips responded to the density of flowers only in response to highly scented flowers, and were attracted equally to mixtures of colours and single colours of flowers. There was a consistent preference by WFT in the spring for flowers located at ground level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".