Palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the Port Moody Interstade, a nonglacial interval in southwestern British Columbia at about 18 000 <sup>14</sup>C years BP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New palynological data from peaty sediments deposited during the Port Moody Interstade, at about 18 000 14C years, indicate that the environment in the western Fraser Lowland of British Columbia consisted of subalpine forest and parkland with abundant fir and spruce that grew under a temperate and moist climate, similar to the wetter subzones of the present-day Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir biogeoclimatic zone. The moist conditions interpreted for the Port Moody Interstade are consistent with recent computer modelling and earlier palynological data from unglaciated western Washington State, but appear to contradict regional Cooperative Holocene Mapping Project (COHMAP) reconstructions and some earlier palaeoenvironmental studies that support dry conditions. Strong seasonality is suggested as part of the explanation, with Pacific storms in summer following the southern margin of the last Cordilleran ice sheet, bringing abundant moisture to the study area during the growing season, but probably not in winter, when storm tracks were displaced to the south. The cold and dry anticyclonic winds postulated by COHMAP were probably also relatively weak in summer, resulting in stronger expression of moist Pacific air masses than previously thought. The timing of the Port Moody Interstade coincides with that of a short climatic fluctuation reported from several other sites in both the northern and southern hemispheres. These events, if causally related, suggest a rapidly propagated atmosphericoceanic signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".