MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999495670 · doi:10.1093/fs/55.3.425

Rene Char et la metaphore Rimbaud: la lecture a l'oeuvre. By Anne-Marie Fortier. (Espace litteraire). Les Presses de l'Universite de Montreal, 1999. 260 pp. Pb C$24.95.

2001· article· fr· W1999495670 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Brophy

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article REVIEWS Get access Rene Char et la metaphore Rimbaud: la lecture a l' auvre. BY ANNE-MARIE FORTIER, (Espace litteraire) Les Presses de l'Universite de Montreal, 1999. 260. pp. Pb. C$24.95. MICHAEL BROPHY MICHAEL BROPHY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume LV, Issue 3, July 2001, Pages 425–426, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/LV.3.425 Published: 01 July 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207