MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999503064 · doi:10.1080/10236660701431021

Monitoring the Cross-Linking of a HPAm/Cr(III) Acetate Polymer Gel Using<sup>1</sup>H NMR, UV Spectrophotometry, Bottle Testing, and Rheology

2007· article· en· W1999503064 on OpenAlexaff
Silvia Magnolia Vargas-Vasquez, Laura Romero‐Zerón, R. MacGregor, Senthil Gopalakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrophotometryBottlePolymerRheologyMaterials scienceProton NMRNuclear chemistryPolyacrylamideChromatographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gelation of a polymer gel formulated at 40°C with 7500 mg/L of partly hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAm) and 3000 mg/L of Cr(III) acetate 50% active was monitored for 72 h using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques, oscillatory rheology, bottle testing, and UV spectrophotometry. During the first 5 h, 1H NMR techniques detected changes in the polymer gel signal intensity and transverse relaxation that may be related to the rheological properties of the HPAm/Cr(III) acetate polymer gels. Bottle testing and UV spectrophotometry detected additional changes during 30 and 72 h respectively. Monitoring of the gelation process using these techniques is presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Polymer Analysis and CharacterizationSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207