MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W199952022 · doi:10.1089/fpd.2014.1830

Comparison of Intestinal Bacterial Populations Between Two Dairy Cattle Herds Colonized or Not by <i>Campylobacter jejuni</i>

2014· article· en· W199952022 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Ward, Évelyne Guévremont

Bibliographic record

VenueFoodborne Pathogens and Disease · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCampylobacter jejuniBiologyFecesMicrobiologyHaeIIIHerdTerminal restriction fragment length polymorphismCampylobacterCampylobacteriosisBovine milkRestriction fragment length polymorphismBacteriaPolymerase chain reactionFood scienceGeneAnimal scienceGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Campylobacter jejuni is an important foodborne pathogen. It can be isolated from bovine feces and its presence is influenced by farm characteristics and management practices. The impact of the bovine gut microbiota on the presence of C. jejuni is poorly documented. Two herds of lactating cows were selected: one where C. jejuni was not detected in 20 animals and the other where 55% of the sampled animals (11/20) were contaminated by C. jejuni. The bacterial diversity of bovine feces from these two herds was analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. The full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified using fluorescently labeled primers and subsequently digested with HaeIII. Terminal restriction fragments profiles comparison showed a similarity level >79% between microbial populations from both herds. As profiles containing or not C. jejuni were clustered together, it is proposed that the presence of C. jejuni is not linked to a particular profile from the recovered intestinal bovine microbiota.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoodborne Pathogens and DiseaseSame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207