Valence orbital response to pseudorotation of tetrahydrofuran: A snapshot using dual space analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pseudorotation of tetrahydrofuran (THF) (C(4)H(8)O) has been studied using density functional theory, with respect to the valence orbital responses to the ionization potentials and to orbital electron and momentum distributions. Three conformations of THF, the global minimum structure C(s), local minimum structure C(2), and a transition state structure C(1), which are characteristic configurations on the potential energy surface, are examined using the SAOP/et-pVQZ//B3LYP/6-311++G** models with the aforementioned dual space analysis. It is noted in the ionization energy spectra that the minimum structures C(s) and C(2) are not directly connected by pseudorotation, but through the transition state structure C(1). As a result, some orbitals of the C(s) conformer are able to "correlate" to orbitals of the C(2) conformer without a strict symmetry constraint, i.e., orbital 7a' of the C(s) conformer is correlated to orbital 5b of the C(2) conformer. It is also noted that although the valence orbital ionization potentials are not significantly altered by the pseudorotation of THF, their spectra (mainly due to excitation) are quite different indeed. Detailed orbital analysis based on dual space analysis is given. The valence orbital behavior of the conformations is orbital dependent. It can be approximately divided into three groups: the "signature group" is associated with orbitals experiencing significant changes. The frontier orbitals are in this group. The "nearly identical group" includes orbitals without apparent changes across the conformations. Most of the orbitals showing a certain degree of distortion during the pseudorotation process belong to the third group. The present study demonstrates that a comprehensive understanding of the pseudorotation of THF and its dynamics requires multidimensional information and that the information gained from momentum space is complementary to that from the more familiar coordinate space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".