MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999540397 · doi:10.2217/fon.14.163

On the Contribution of S100A10 and Annexin A2 to Plasminogen Activation and Oncogenesis: An Enduring Ambiguity

2014· review· en· W1999540397 on OpenAlexafffund
Moamen Bydoun, David M. Waisman

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Oncology · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCarcinogenesisAmbiguityAnnexin A2Cancer researchAnnexinCancerInternal medicinePathologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasminogen receptors are becoming increasingly relevant in regulating many diseases such as cancer, stroke and inflammation. However, controversy has emerged concerning the putative role of some receptors, in particular annexin A2, in binding plasminogen. Several reports failed to account for the effects of annexin A2 on the stability and conformation of its binding partner S100A10. This has created an enduring ambiguity as to the actual function of annexin A2 in plasmin regulation. Supported by a long line of evidence, we conclude that S100A10, and not annexin A2, is the primary plasminogen receptor within the annexin A2-S100A10 complex and contributes to the plasmin-mediated effects that were originally ascribed to annexin A2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture OncologySame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207