MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999541884 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0345

Image watermark detection in the wavelet domain using Bessel K densities

2013· article· en· W1999541884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBessel functionWatermarkWaveletArtificial intelligenceWavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceMathematicsComputer visionAlgorithmMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors propose a wavelet domain still image watermark detection method which uses the Bessel K probability density function to describe the distribution of wavelet coefficients. In this study, watermark detection is formulated as a binary statistical decision problem which is to detect a signal submerged in the noise that follows a Bessel K distribution. Using this formulation, an optimal watermark detector using likelihood ratio test is proposed. The experimental results of the proposed method in a variety of situations demonstrate that the proposed method has a robust detection performance for additive spread spectrum watermarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it