MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1999552398 · doi:10.2118/165369-ms

Effect of Bitumen Viscosity and Bitumen-Water Interfacial Tension on the Efficiency of Steam Assisted Bitumen Recovery Processes

2013· article· en· W1999552398 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nikolas Romaniuk, L. Little, F. A. Arguelles, Tayfun Babadagli, B. Özüm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaBarrick Gold (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsphaltOil sandsSolventSurface tensionViscosityPulp and paper industryPetroleum engineeringHydrocarbonChemistryWaste managementChemical engineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryGeologyComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Alberta, Canada bitumen is commercially produced by in-situ processes at about 830,000 bbl/d capacity, production capacity is projected to exceed 5,000,000 bbl/d in the next two decades. Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process is one of the in-situ bitumen recovery processes; the economics and efficiency of which would be improved by reducing the steam to bitumen ratio. For this purpose, the addition of light hydrocarbon solvents into steam as a solvent to reduce bitumen viscosity has been studied; however, several decades of research efforts has resulted in only limited commercial success. More recently, as an alternative to solvent addition, the use of biodiesel (fatty acid methyl esters) with steam as a surfactant additive reducing bitumen-water interfacial tension was proposed and studied experimentally (Babadagli et al, 2009; Babadagli and Ozum, 2010). In the present study, experiments were performed at typical reservoir pressure conditions to evaluate the performance of solvent (pentane) addition with steam to reduce viscosity and biodiesel addition with steam to reduce bitumen-water interfacial tension to improve bitumen recovery efficiency. The results showed that bitumen recovery efficiency may decrease with the addition of hydrocarbon solvent if the solvent is added after a certain period of steam injection. Solvent addition to the steam was tested at 5% and 15% of bitumen mass dosages. Steam assisted bitumen recovery tests with biodiesel addition under 2-g/kg-bitumen dosage showed an increase in bitumen recovery efficiency. To further investigate the reasons behind the lowered recovery with solvent addition, an analytical model was developed to predict heat transfer and pressure fields in the reservoir causing Darcy flow, and therefore, bitumen mobility. The distribution of the aqueous and solvent phases injected in time and space considering the phase change (steam and solvent condensation) effect with respect to steam chamber were clarified for different injection conditions and scenarios. The results and observation will be useful in defining the appropriate application conditions for both solvent as a viscosity reducer and biodiesel as an interfacial tension reducer additive in SAGD operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→