MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999556453 · doi:10.1063/1.1370361

Ablation of aluminum thin films by ultrashort laser pulses

2001· article· en· W1999556453 on OpenAlex
Boris Le Drogoff, François Vidal, Y. von Kaenel, Mohamed Chaker, T. W. Johnston, S. Laville, Mohamad Sabsabi, J. Margot

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluenceMaterials scienceSiliconLaserLaser ablationPlasmaAluminiumAblationSubstrate (aquarium)OpticsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, various results are presented for laser ablation experiments on aluminum and silicon, made in ambient air by means of subpicosecond laser pulses. These results include threshold fluences for plasma formation and for the appearance of various spectral lines, and the single shot fluence required to remove aluminum layers of various specific thicknesses (ranging from 10 to 500 nm) deposited on a silicon substrate. The threshold fluence for plasma formation is of the order of 0.1 J/cm2. Threshold fluences for the appearance of the spectral lines considered vary from 0.1 to about 5 J/cm2. Finally, our results suggest that for high fluences, even for ultrashort laser pulses, the ablation depth is essentially determined by a long-range process, such as thermal conduction in the solid, rather than by the short range optical depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it