Estimates of Percutaneous Toxicity of Sulfur Mustard Vapor Suitable for Use in Protective Equipment Standards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analysis was performed of historical human chamber data for exposure to sulfur mustard vapor, in order to correlate skin exposure dosages with effects in a manner specifically suitable for use in protective clothing standards. Data were reanalyzed to take into account (1) body region variability of skin responses to a single acute exposure to sulfur mustard vapor, (2) effect of hot/humid versus cooler exposure, and (3) influence of clothing. This approach permits deriving predicted skin responses pertinent to a protective clothing wearer, for a relatively short single acute exposure to vapor (up to a few hours) under the hot/humid conditions expected within a protective ensemble. Values for permissible dermal exposure to sulfur mustard vapor are proposed for protected emergency responders or military serving in combat theaters that may be used in standards intended to be employed in conjunction with evaluation of vapor protection provided by individual protective equipment for protection against chemical warfare agents by Man-in-Simulant vapor test methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".