Electrospun PEG–PLA nanofibrous membrane for sustained release of hydrophilic antibiotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reported in this study is the successful incorporation of a hydrophilic antibiotic drug, tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH), into electrospun PEG–PLA nanofibrous membrane without loss of its bioactivity. Degradation behavior of the copolymer was studied in vitro. Release behavior of TCH from the electrospun membrane and antimicrobial effects of the TCH‐loaded membrane against Staphylococcus aureus culture were investigated. The medicated nanofibrous membrane demonstrated sustained release of TCH over 6 days and was found to be effective in inhibiting growth of S. aureus. In addition, increasing the antibiotic drug content in the electrospun membranes was found to enhance the anti‐bacterial effectiveness of the medicated fiber mats. And the combination of mechanical barriers provided by the electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous membranes and their capability of local sustained delivery of antibiotics made these membranes more useful in biomedical applications, particularly as new wound dressings for ulcers caused by diabetes or other diseases, and to provide a better means of treatment for these malignant wounds and ulcers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".