Tailoring the Key in a Molecular Lock-and-Key Model System: The Propylene Oxide···2-Fluoroethanol Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conformational isomerism of the propylene oxide (PO)...2-fluoroethanol (FE) complex has been investigated using molecular beam Fourier-transform microwave spectroscopy complemented with high level ab initio calculations. Rotational transitions of three different binary conformers have been observed experimentally. On the basis of the agreement of the experimental and calculated rotational constants, they could be identified as the three most stable structures, anti G-g+, anti G+g-, and syn G+g-. All the observed structures exhibit a primary O-H...O hydrogen bond, an intramolecular O-H...F hydrogen bond and two secondary intermolecular C-H...F contacts. The two anti conformers, with FE and the PO methyl group on the opposite sides of the oxirane ring, show higher abundances than the syn conformer. In all three observed conformers, FE remains approximately in its favorable compact gauche conformation. The monofluorination of the molecular lock-and-key model system PO...ethanol increases not only the number of possible binary conformers, but also the discrimination energy among them. The superior discrimination ability of FE as compared to ethanol classifies it as a tailored key to the PO lock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".