MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999698689 · doi:10.1093/fs/kni252

The Material, the Real and the Fractured Self: Subjectivity and Representation from Rimbaud to Réda

2005· article· en· W1999698689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Sheringham

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityPoetryMateriality (auditing)LiteratureArtAestheticsBiographyEthnographySociologyPhilosophyAnthropologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By Susan Harrow. University of Toronto Press, 2004. 269 pp. Hb £35.00; $55.00. In this admirable study, Susan Harrow revitalizes the study of modern French poetry — scandalously under-researched despite the treasures displayed here on every vivid page — by using ideas from cultural theory, autobiography theory and art history. The prime focus is on the interaction between embodied subjectivity and the materiality of the real, with language's own material riches as indispensable go-between. Throughout, Harrow shows how poetry works to resist the homogenizing pressures of modern capitalist society. Three of the four poets examined are canonical, but in each case the critic shows them in a new light. Stressing the ‘hyperactive outwardness’ of his project, Harrow sees Rimbaud as a poet of mess and debris as well as sensation and colour, whose texts, crammed with discordant and fragmentary discourses, embrace the body's dissident priorities. In Apollinaire, the tensions between materiality and subjectivity are probed in a brilliant new account of the war poems in Calligrammes. Far from representing indifference to the horrors of war, Apollinaire's poetic performances — read as autobiographical fantasy — embody poetry's resistance to ready-made responses, enacting the anxiety and irresolution fostered by participation in historical calamity. ‘Combining the roles of participant, ethnographer, and memorialist of war’, Apollinaire creates verbal and visual artefacts that render the soldier-self's negotiations with the real. Drawing on ethnographies of the everyday, Harrow develops a superb reading where ‘the obsessive naming of parts’ and ‘pleasurable immersion in small things’ offset the terrible generalities of war, providing small havens of agency. Renderings of colloquial speech likewise indicate how lexical inventiveness and homosocial bonding serve to shore up collective self-identity, as do pervasive references to the feminine and the erotic, which Harrow treats with considerable insight. In Ponge's writing, Harrow, with considerable originality, considers the configuration of the cultural, the material and the subjective, drawing on recent theoretical reorientations that have (partially) reinstated the human subject. Analysing the alienated subjectivity behind the mordant social critique of the early Douze petits écrits, Harrow goes on to explore the attention to bodily (often oral, erotic) experience in Ponge's famous celebrations of mundane things. Thereafter, through close readings, she shows that Ponge's attention to the overlooked is restorative with regard to the self as well as the world. This lays ideal foundations for a fourth poet, Jacques Réda, given his first extensive treatment in English. In Réda, as in Ponge, we encounter a subject in process, constantly made and unmade in negotiations with the outside world. In Réda's case, this pliancy (a key notion developed by Harrow) is exercised amidst the sights and sounds of city or suburb, traversed endlessly on foot or Solex. Harrow views Réda as an ‘artisan of the everyday’, making parallels with Michel de Certeau, notably with regard to walking in the city and to the quotidian as a zone of resistance (an excellent comparison is also made with Agnès Varda's film, Les Glaneurs et la glaneuse). Exploring the embodied, kinetic character of Réda's ‘excursive desire’, Harrow investigates his treatment of ordinary ‘micro-practices’ identified in the apparently nondescript. A final section, linking back to Rimbaud and Ponge, shows how in Réda attempts to articulate nuances of colour betoken the movements of desiring subjectivity. Beautifully written, engaged without being rhapsodic, always to the point, Susan Harrow's fine book will be a major reference-point for many years to come.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207