MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling and Control of Fish Feeder System

2013· article· en· W1999760222 on OpenAlexaff
Badrul Aisham Md Zain, Muhammad Hazwan Md Jamal, Salihatun Md Salleh

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPID controllerMATLABAquacultureSoftwareControl theory (sociology)Fish <Actinopterygii>Controller (irrigation)Profit (economics)Control systemControl engineeringRecirculating aquaculture systemComputer scienceEngineeringSimulationControl (management)FisheryTemperature controlBiologyOperating systemEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food and feeding become a major challenge in aquaculture development. The way adjustment of food delivery to pond is an important role to get the maximum return or profit to aquaculture entrepreneurs. This project presents an investigation about the fish feeding system, a system device to feed fish at predetermined amounts of food and time. Moreover, the system is designed with a computer monitored system in order to manage and control the system with simulation. This project is a simulation investigation into the development of PID controller using Matlab/Simulink software. The simulation development of the PID controller with the mathematical model of fish feeder system is done using trial and error method. The PID parameter is to be tested with a DC motor. As a result, the best value of PID controller is achieved when Kp = 100, Ki = 0.05 and Kd = 25.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207