MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999761787 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.214445

Phase diagrams of site-frustrated Heisenberg models on simple cubic, bcc, and fcc lattices

2006· article· en· W1999761787 on OpenAlexafffund
A. D. Beath, D. H. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismFrustrationCondensed matter physicsCubic crystal systemFerromagnetismPhysicsPhase diagramLattice (music)Heisenberg modelPhase transitionRenormalization groupSimple cubic latticeMonte Carlo methodPhase (matter)Quantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have determined the phase diagrams of the site-frustrated Heisenberg model in three dimensions over the entire concentration regime of competing ferromagnetic (F) and antiferromagnetic (A) sites for the three basic lattice types: simple cubic (sc), body-centered cubic (bcc) and face-centered cubic (fcc) using Monte Carlo methods. Long-range ferromagnetic (FM) or antiferromagnetic (AF) order is established at a finite temperature, second-order phase transition whenever F or A sites percolate. Since site percolation thresholds in three dimensions are less than $\frac{1}{2}$, FM and AF order coexist over a wide composition regime. The only apparent effect of frustration is to cause the AF and FM order to occur perpendicular to one another. Strong evidence is found to suggest that all of the transitions remain in the Heisenberg universality class and that there exists a tetracritical point at $x=\frac{1}{2}$ where ${T}_{C}={T}_{N}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207