Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existing telecommunications industry is becoming transformed as a result of various innovations driven by advances in technology, market conditions, and regulatory changes. The development of technologies such as Voice over the Internet Protocol–Internet Protocol Telephony (VoIP–IP Telephony) and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) have increased the scope of the telecommunications industry by migrating existing services, which were separate from the telecommunications industry, to the telecommunications industry. 1 1. Tony Kern discusses how recent innovation in technology has resulted in the need for the telecom industry to grow into the service markets specifically offering a convergence of data, voice, video, and wireless services (Kern, Dec. 2005, 32). The increased competition in data transport services has substantially reduced the level of profits of many telecommunications providers, resulting in a branching of new services that utilize the transport services. The 1996 Telecommunications Act has allowed growing consolidation of telecommunications providers to support the past model of transport services failing to adapt to significant changes presently occurring. 2 2. The Telecom Act of 96 attempts to separate content providers from the underlying network infrastructure unitized by the content providers; additionally the Telecom Act allows telcos to enter the content market. The act fails to accommodate a classification for services based on varying aspects of the technology used to deliver those services creating rigidity within the market (Whitt, May 2004, 587–673). This shift is suitably being capitalized by several key organizations within and outside the traditional structure of the telecommunications industry and by doing so challenging the existing regulatory framework. As the scope of telecommunication industry increases to deal with existing services and the creation of new services the federal regulations governing the industry are increasingly becoming inadequate, hindering further developments. Additionally, the increased scope of the telecommunications industry has resulted in a disparity between the level of services provided and possibility of potential services resulting in new offerings by telecommunications providers enticing new entrants in the market. Telecommunications providers and new market entrants have or are in the process of developing new infrastructure to sustain the convergence of existing services and new service offerings, which can be delivered seamlessly across a variety of media. 3 3. Service providers have speculated on the necessity of supporting varying platforms that will be utilized in the delivery for their converged services (Canadian Business, Jan. 2006, 47–51). (Telecommunications International, Dec. 2005, 14–16). (Fuller, Jan. 2006, 1–4). (Electronic Engineering Times, Jan. 2006, 22). The converging services will reflect two possible developments; one will result in innovation of the existing market creating a new niche; the other result is the creation of a new industry spun off from the telecommunications industry. In summary, the primary purpose of this article is to understand the changes occurring in the telecommunications industry, the key aspects driving this change, the various components within and outside the telecommunications industry that are capitalizing on this change, and the future development of the telecommunications industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.073 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".