MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999821985 · doi:10.1002/app.1577

Proton uptake by poly(2‐vinylpyridine) coatings

2001· article· en· W1999821985 on OpenAlex
Nisit Tantavichet, Mark Pritzker, Charles M. Burns

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtonationTitrationPyridineTitration curveProtonPolymerCoatingPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceAcid–base titrationIonChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryNanotechnologyComposite materialPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A titration technique has been used to directly measure the proton uptake by ion‐exchange poly(2‐vinylpyridine) coatings as a function of solution pH. Contrary to the common assumption that each nitrogen in the pyridine ring is attached to an H + when the polymer film is fully protonated, the use of the titration technique has shown that the portion of the pyridine sites actually protonated does not exceed 25% anywhere in the pH range where the coating is stable. The p K a value for the poly(2‐vinylpyridine) coating has also been estimated to be 4.5 from the titration curve. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 1493–1497, 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it