MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999827080 · doi:10.1097/eja.0b013e32835415ea

Neuroscientific Foundations of Anesthesiology

2012· article· en· W1999827080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George A. Mashour, Ralph Lydic

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuroscienceNervous systemUnconsciousnessAutonomic nervous systemCognitive scienceAnesthesiologyPeripheral nervous systemCentral nervous systemAnesthesiaEngineering ethicsPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This textbook has been edited by a basic scientist and a clinical scientist based in Michigan and the many contributors hail, almost exclusively, from either the USA or Canada. The background of the editorial partnership is reflected in Neuroscientific Foundations of Anesthesiology; the text aims to explore anaesthetics as a branch of neuroscience – combining clinical anaesthesia with the basic science of the nervous system. The philosophical introduction argues that it is anaesthetists, above neurologists or neurosurgeons, who are the clinicians most commonly modulating the nervous system in daily practice and this statement reflects the direction along which the book as been written. The book is structured into seven parts, with a systems-based approach looking initially at the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nervous system and autonomic nervous system; with the final two sections focusing on the neuromuscular junction and then neural toxicity related to the administration of general anaesthetics. The first half of the book, which concentrates on the central and peripheral nervous system, is fairly dry with chapters dedicated to the cellular and molecular effects of general anaesthetics, the thalamocortical system and it's role in unconsciousness, memory processing and anaesthetic-induced mobility. These opening chapters contain little of direct clinical relevance and are much more orientated to the basic science. However, the following sections, which concentrate on the autonomic nervous system and neuromuscular junction, are written with more of a clinical emphasis and contain well presented sections detailing the pharmacology of agents affecting the two systems. The final part of the book looks at the neurotoxic potential of general anaesthetics. This contentious, though contemporary, area is covered initially with a look into the current evidence for anaesthesia-mediated neurotoxicity and highlights areas of rapidly emerging research. Following this, there is an excellent chapter on postoperative cognitive disorders. This chapter begins with three case studies and then a detailed report of up to date evidence surrounding the mechanisms of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and its distinction from delirium and dementia. It looks at methods to minimise the risks of POCD specific to orthopaedic and cardiac surgery and also has a section on current research in the area. The final chapter is a brief overview of neurodegenerative disorders and anaesthesia, which includes short sections on Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. The book is extensively referenced and given the amount of basic science contained in the chapters, it is written in such a way that the wealth information is easily assimilated. The illustrations are plentiful, well presented and compliment the text. Some sections, such as the final chapter on anaesthesia and neurodegenerative disorders, are, however, surprising light and almost come across as an afterthought – especially when compared with the detail of some of the earlier chapters. Overall, this is a thought provoking, interesting text with a refreshing take on anaesthesia's place in the discipline of neuroscience. Although it contains a great deal of useful clinical information, the amount of basic science contained in the earlier chapters give it the feel of a reference text for a department rather than a book to guide clinical practice for the majority of anaesthetists. JH Rosser Specialist Registrar, Sheffield and South Yorkshire School of Anaesthesia, Sheffield, UK MD Wiles Consultant Neuroanaesthetist, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of AnaesthesiologySame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207