MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999856954 · doi:10.1063/1.3327239

Steady flow through a curved tube with wavy walls

2010· article· en· W1999856954 on OpenAlexaff
Sean D. Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsMechanicsCurvatureVortexNewtonian fluidShear stressCompressibilitySecondary flowPerturbation (astronomy)Pipe flowTube (container)Classical mechanicsGeometryTurbulenceMaterials scienceMathematicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of fully developed steady flow of an incompressible Newtonian fluid through a mildly curved tube with wavy walls of small amplitude-to-wavelength ratio around the tube circumference is solved via a perturbation solution. Dean’s original solution for tubes with circular cross-section is used as the foundation to solve the current regular perturbation problem. In general, the wavy walls are found to mitigate the effect of a given term in Dean’s expansion. For instance, the first order effect of the wavy walls is to reduce the strength of the secondary flow vortices and minimize the reduction of the volumetric flow rate caused by the curvature. A related effect is a general reduction in the average axial and circumferential wall shear stresses. The local wall shear stress, however, increases at the points of maximum incursion of the protrusions into the flow and decreases in the valleys between the protuberances. The general form of the solution for an arbitrary number of protuberances is presented to first order in the geometric perturbation and to fourth order in the Dean number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207