MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999886197 · doi:10.1029/2001ja000294

Twelve‐hour tides in the winter northern polar mesosphere and lower thermosphere

2002· article· en· W1999886197 on OpenAlexaffabout
Genene M. Fisher, Richard John Niciejewski, T. L. Killeen, William A. Gault, G. G. Shepherd, Stephen Brown, Qian Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermosphereMesopauseAtmospheric sciencesAltitude (triangle)Atmospheric tideMesosphereGeologyAmplitudeBayZonal and meridionalClimatologyStratosphereOceanographyIonospherePhysicsGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An investigation of the tidal oscillations near the winter northern polar mesopause has been carried out at Resolute Bay, Canada (74.9°N, 94.9°W). The daily, monthly, and annual variations of the tidal field were studied using the 1995/1996 and 1996/1997 data. Ground‐based measurements were obtained using a Fabry‐Perot interferometer with a circle to line interferometric optical system (FPI/CLIO) and the E Region Wind Interferometer (ERWIN). The FPI/CLIO observed the Doppler winds of the OH emission near 86 km altitude. The ERWIN provided simultaneous OH (near 86 km) and OI (near 97 km) wind measurements. Monthly data were compared to the Global Scale Wave Model (GSWM) and the Forbes/Vial Solar Semidiurnal Tidal Model predictions. Analysis of the 12‐hour oscillation near 86 and 97 km altitudes indicates that it is persistent and characteristic of a semidiurnal propagating tide. The semidiurnal tide was found to be highly variable in amplitude and phase from day to day. The observations presented provide a continuous and extensive data set for the winter season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207